Christine Phan

Verizon - web

Changing utility providers is often nerve-wracking. And when it involves credit checks, the decision is carefully thought through. Verizon wanted to make it easier for customers wanting to switch their mobile line over. The product to be created would ease the process for both customers and store representatives as it will be used by both. It will provide a cost breakdown that can be saved, reviewed and completing the switch online or in-store.

Our agency, R/GA New York, partnered with Verizon to introduce a simulator tool helping users to get an accurate cost to switch their mobile line. My team was in charge of designing the credit check and the checkout mechanism. The app has a modern design with elegant micro-animations, yet transparent to the user regarding the cost.

SKILLSResearch, personas, information architecture, user flows, sitemap, sketches, wireframes, testing storyboards, digital prototype.

Latest work
Verizon web main image

1. Discovery

Competitive_Analysis_icon Competitive Analysis

We researched how to switch to the competitor’s network as well as the related costs. Our test was done on T-mobile, Sprint, AT&T, Metro PCS and Boost. Some competitors use tongue-and-cheek tonality to engage customers, others have no credit check plans. But as it turns out, none of the competitors have a service providing a quote to the customer interested in switching over. Verizon is the only one to offer this simulator.

Features_Analysis_icon Feature Analysis

During our test, we analyzed and compared the features and services provided by Verizon and its competitors. This helped us refine and confirm our list to deliver. Here is an example of the analysis we have performed.








Soft credit check no impact on credit


Bringing phone number over


Bring your own device






Save information


Filter by credit rate (good/ average / no credit check)


No credit check plan

interview_icon Interviews

Partnered with the research team, we wanted to find out a few key points, for example; how was research done prior to switching, what platform was used to complete the switch, the customer’s understanding of credit check and do customers know their credit score, or is it difficult to run?

Key findings

  • Interviewees perform mainly online research and comparison.
  • The completion is split between online and in-store to get a “better deal“.
  • Interviewees have had a credit check performed at least twice but haven’t necessarily run the process themselves.
  • Interviewees rarely know their credit scores.
personas_icon Personas

Studying the research results helped us refine the 3 representative users created. Jim likes to keep an eye on the cost, while Megan wants an overall upgrade for the family and finally Jake likes the latest and greatest gadgets.

persona_jim_photo Jim, 45 Married, has a freshman in college, a teenager and a pre-teen Finance Director High income, good credit "I want to swap to keep contact with Brian now in college." Needs Making sure to have enough gigs for the family. Bring my own device - BYOD. Being able to trade-in our old phones. Change phone number. Pain points Confusing process for BYOD. Hate seeing too many plan sizes. Being able to pick the new phone numbers.
persona_megan_photo Megan, 40 Married, has a teenager and a pre-teen VP of Marketing High income, very good credit "It's time for a change and an upgrade." Needs Being able to get offers. Having a good panel of plans. Bring phone numbers over. Having a Free shipping option. Pain points Don’t want to send contacts new number. Can’t save research for a later consultation. Unsure when the price shown includes taxes.
persona_jake_photo Jake, 28 Single, no kids Video editor Medium income, average credit "I like to get the latest gadgets as soon as possible." Needs Having enough gigs for streaming. Having access to the latest phones. Being able to trade-in old phone. Pick-up available close to work. Pain points Having to wait for delivery. Not having the latest phones available. Having shipping options.
userflow_and_sitemap_icon User flow & site map

User flow

The tasks to perform credit checks were easy to identify. The placement of the credit check in the simulator flow was the challenge. We explored multiple scenarios until it felt natural without removing the seriousness of the task. Here is an example of performing a soft credit.

Site map

The simulator tool solution was to be embedded in the original structure. So, drawing the existing hierarchy and adding the new elements without intrusion was the natural approach.

2. Ideation & Design

sketches_icon Sketches

We had a quick sprint of 2 weeks to deliver the feature set given to us. We captured the list of requirements on a corner of the board, then sketched and iterated 5 or 6 times a day depending on the feature.


3. User Testing

We put a polished version of our design into a digital prototype to challenge our decisions. We asked users to run a credit check and focused on finding answers on element placements, tone of voice and iconography.

icon_low_fi Digital prototype - low fi wireframes
Prototype low-fi

Key findings

  1. The CTA placement was creating confusion for users.
  2. The progress bar indicated where the user was, but not how close the user was to completion.
  3. The copy didn't provide enough explanation related to the results.
  4. The graph was too minimalist and users couldn't find how to view the cost breakdown.
icon_hi_fi Digital prototype - hi fi iteration
Prototype low-fi

Key findings

  1. Amending the CTA shape brought some softness to the page.
  2. Adding the estimated figures was necessary to bring more cohesion to the page and a comparative element.
  3. The copy provided a better information on the cost, but still had the small print feeling.
  4. Showing the elements that composed the updated costs due today and monthly brought more transparency.
icon_hi_fi Digital prototype - high fi final
Prototype rendered



Relocating the CTA to an eye level reduced cognitive load for the users.


Breaking down the progress bar into segments gave a better sense of the process completion.


Changing the tone of voice gave more positive feedback and clarity on the impact of the action taken.


Removing the graph made it easier for users to understand the variance in costs.


The feedback from the internal stakeholders was positive. The design is currently being implemented

by the Verizon technical team along with the relevant quality control and testing.

  • Adjectives describing the simulator: Clear, easy, transparent.

    Bill, Tester
  • I like that I can keep the quote and go to the store to talk to somebody.

    Ann, Tester
  • Running the process from start to finish is clear and quick.

    Clare, Tester
Verizon web